Oh by the way, you don’t win arguments by denigrating people or their work. If you’ve read Sowell and Mises and disagree or can invalidate their work so be it, but it’s a sign of weakness to say they are “not serious economists.”
Oh by the way, you don’t win arguments by denigrating people or their work. If you’ve read Sowell and Mises and disagree or can invalidate their work so be it, but it’s a sign of weakness to say they are “not serious economists.”
Yet you didn't have any problem whatsoever with dismissing Marx as an ‘evil’ man with ‘bad’ ideas. Ideas that you at least partially agree with, as based on your definition with the means of production above, a phrase Marx certainly popularised if not coined.
Oh by the way, you don’t win arguments by denigrating people or their work. If you’ve read Sowell and Mises and disagree or can invalidate their work so be it, but it’s a sign of weakness to say they are “not serious economists.”
Yet you didn't have any problem whatsoever with dismissing Marx as an ‘evil’ man with ‘bad’ ideas. Ideas that you at least partially agree with, as based on your definition with the means of production above, a phrase Marx certainly popularised if not coined.