13 Comments
⭠ Return to thread

Perhaps you are right, maybe I'm not willing to entertain a certain level of violence beyond what I consider a reasonable defensive threshold, because I think some human costs are too high, and their outcomes are too uncertain, too immoral, and too unlikely to produce the results I'd like to see. But it seems we both agree that violence will come from those who oppose their power being challenged either way.

I have a little awareness of Lacan (and Fanon, Fromm, and Žižek, who I've read and seemed to have some association with Freudo-Marxism.) I'll add that book to my reading list, but I'm afraid it may be a little while before I get to it.

Expand full comment

Since you are clearly incredibly intelligent which books would you recommend for me?

Expand full comment

I'll take the compliment, even if I'm not sure I deserve it. What are you looking to read and learn more about?

The fundamental philosophical underpinnings of Anarcho-Communism were well enough described in the Works of Kropotkin and Malatesta, although their use of language may seem a little dated.

I've read many Anarchist treatments and rebuttals of Marxist works, and especially Leninist ones from Bakunin to the present, but they still rely on beginning with fundamentally different assumptions. The Anarchist Library has many such examples.

As for the practical nature of Anarchism you could do worse than reading 'Anarchy Works' or 'Worshipping Power' by Peter Gelderoos (and his work in favour of Anarchist violence, 'How Nonviolence Protects the State'), 'Anarchy In Action' by Colin Ward, and 'The Dawn Of Everything' by David Graeber.

Expand full comment